Linqit
Extend python lists operations using .NET's LINQ syntax for clean and fast coding.
Extends python's list builtin with fun, robust functionality - .NET's Language Integrated Queries (Linq) and more. Write clean code with powerful syntax. The project is written primarily in Python, distributed under the Apache License 2.0 license, first published in 2018. Key topics include: awesome, batch-processing, clean, clean-code, csharp.
Linqit!
Extends python's list builtin with fun, robust functionality - .NET's Language Integrated Queries (Linq) and more.<br>
Write clean code with powerful syntax.<br><br>
<center> <img src="https://img.shields.io/badge/Test Coverage-96%25-brightgreen"> </center> <br>shellpip install linqit
Stop using loops, complex conditions, list comprehension and filters.<br>
Doesn't it looks better? <br>
pythonfrom linqit import List # Go ahead and fill the list with whatever you want... like a list of <Programmer> objects. programmers = List() Avi = type("Avi", (), {}) Entrepreneur = type("Entrepreneur", ('talented'), {}) elon_musk = Entrepreneur(talented=True) # Then play: last_hot_pizza_slice = ( programmers.where(lambda e: e.experience > 15) .except_for(elon_musk) .of_type(Avi) .take(3) # [<Avi>, <Avi>, <Avi>] .select(lambda avi: avi.lunch) # [<Pizza>, <Pizza>, <Pizza>] .where(lambda p: p.is_hot() and p.origin != "Pizza Hut") .last() # <Pizza> .slices.last() # <PizzaSlice> ) # What do you think?
We all use multiple aggregations in our code, while multiple filters/comprehensions are not pythonic at all.<br>
The whole idea is is to use it for nested, multiple filters/modifications :).<br>
Some of the methods might look ridiculous for a single calls, comparing to the regular python syntax.<br>
Here are some use cases: <br>
Methods:
all
any
concat
contains
distinct
except_for
first
get_by_attr
intersect
last
select
skip
take
where
of_type
Properties:
sum
min
max
avg
sorted
Deeper - Let's play with a list of people, a custom type.
pythonimport List class Person(): def __init__(self, name, age): self.name = name self.age = age def __repr__(self): return f'Person(name="{self.name}", age={self.age})') # Creating a list of people avi, bill, bob, harry = Person('Avi', 23), Person('Bill', 41), Person('Bob', 77), Person('Harry', 55) people = List(avi, bill, bob, harry)
Use LINQ selections, write cleaner code
pythonpeople = people.where(lambda p: p.age > 23) # [<Person name="Bill" age="41">, <Person name="Bob" age="77">, <Person name="Harry" age="55">] people.first() # <Person name="Bill" age="41"> people.last() # <Person name="Harry" age="55"> people.any(lambda p: p.name.lower().startswith('b')) # True people.where(age=55) # [<Person name="Harry" age="55">] people.skip(3).any() # False people.skip(2).first() # <Person name="Harry" age="55"> # Isn't it better than "for", "if", "else", "filter", "map" and list comprehensions in the middle of your code?
More selections
pythonnew_kids_in_town = [Person('Chris', 18), Person('Danny', 16), Person('John', 17)] people += new_kids_in_town # Also works: people = people.concat(new_kids_in_town) teenagers = people.where(lambda p: 20 >= p.age >= 13) danny = teenagers.first(lambda t: t.name == 'Danny') # <Person name="Danny" age="16"> oldest_teen = teenagers.order_by(lambda t: t.age).last() # <Person name="John" age="17">
Let's make python more dynamic
pythonnames = people.name # ['Avi', 'Bill', 'Bob', 'Harry', 'Chris', 'John'] ages = people.age # [23, 41, 77, 55, 18, 17] teenagers_names = teenagers.name # ['Chris', 'Danny', 'John'] teenagers_names.take(2).except_for(lambda n: n == 'Danny') # ['Chris'] teenagers.age.min # 16 teenagers.age.avg # 17 teenagers.age.max # 18
Test Coverage
python➜ linqit git:(master) ✗ coverage report Name Stmts Miss Cover ----------------------------------------- linqit/__init__.py 2 0 100% linqit/linq_list.py 101 11 89% tests/__init__.py 0 0 100% tests/test_list.py 203 0 100% ----------------------------------------- TOTAL 306 11 96%
Contributors
Showing top 7 contributors by commit count.
